an image was here

Kick Nuclear & Japanese Against Nuclear 日立抗議声明プレスリリース


Kick NuclearおよびJapanese Against Nuclearは、日立製作所による原発建設会社ホライズン・ニュークリア・パワーの買収に抗議し、同社が同プロジェクトから撤退するまで同社製品の不買を呼びかけます。

10月31日


Kick NuclearおよびJapanese Against Nuclearは、日立製作所による買収額7億ポンドの原発建設会社ホライズン・ニュークリア・パワーの買収に抗議します。

ホライズン・ニュークリア・パワーはグロスタシャー州オールドベリーと、アングルシー島ウィルファの二ヶ所での新たな原子力発電所建設のため2009年に設立されたジョイントベンチャーです。

日立製作所は日本企業であり、同社役員は今日も続く福島第一原子力発電所の事故による被災状況から、原子力発電の危険を身を持って知っているはずです。日立は事故を起こした福島第一原子力発電所の製造に関わっています。(注1)

これ以上の原子力発電の建設は人々への危険を意味し、私達が直面している長期環境問題にとって何の解決にもなりません。 これらの原子力発電所が建設された場合、日立は短期的利益を得て去るでしょうが、私たちは後世に渡って除染という対価を払うことになります。

私たちには原子力発電所は必要ありません。私たちの電力需要はソーラーパネル、風力タービン、潮力タービンのような再生可能エネルギー技術によって供給が可能であり、日立はその資金を風力、潮力、太陽熱発電プロジェクトに投資するべきです。

Kick NuclearおよびJapanese Against Nuclearは日立の原子力産業からの撤退を要求し、撤退まで同社製品の不買を呼びかけます。

以上


(注1)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-23/fukushima-engineer-says-he-covered-up-flaw-at-shut-reactor.html


UK anti-nuclear groups slam Hitachi acquisition of Horizon, call for boycott

 

Joint media release from Kick Nuclear and Japanese Against Nuclear (UK)


 
October 31, 2012


UK-based anti-nuclear groups Kick Nuclear & Japanese Against Nuclear (UK) [1] have condemned the £700m acquisition of nuclear new build consortium Horizon by Hitachi Ltd. [2] They call on the Japanese firm to abandon its plans to build new nuclear plants in the UK [3] and are calling for a boycott of the company until it does so.
   
Hitachi was responsible for the manufacture of one of the reactors at the Fukushima No.1 plant in Japan, which was devastated by the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami. [4]
 
There are also questions about the reliability of the reactor design Hitachi wishes to build in the UK. [5]
 
Nancy Birch, a spokesperson for Kick Nuclear, said:  
“As a Japanese company with first-hand experience of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, which continues to pollute the environment, Hitachi is only too aware of the dangers of nuclear power.

“Building more nuclear power plants is a danger to everyone and will do nothing to solve the long-term environmental problems we face.
 
“If these nuclear plants are built, it will be us and future generations who will ultimately have to foot the bill for the clean up, with Hitachi walking away with any profits.
 
"We simply don’t need dangerous new nuclear power plants in the UK. Our energy needs can be met more safely, sustainably and cost-effectively through a combination of energy saving and renewable and decentralised energy, including solar, wind and marine energy.

“Instead of building new nuclear white elephants, Hitachi should invest in renewable energy. We want a future, not a disaster.”

  
End


Notes to editors:


 
Shika-2 has been in commercial operation since 2006, yet lifetime operating reliability is less than 50%. Technical problems in the turbines are blamed.

Operational ABWRs include: HAMAOKA 5 (Toshiba), KASHIWAZAKI KARIWA-6  (Toshiba) , KASHIWAZAKI KARIWA-7 (Hitachi) and SHIKA-2 (Hitachi)
 
- From list of reactors in operation worldwide in 2009.
See:
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/CNPP2010_CD/pages/AnnexII/tables/table2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABWR


Reliability

The four ABWRs in operation were often shut down due [to] technical problems. The International Atomic Energy Agency documents this with the 'operating factor' (the time with electricity feed-in relative to the total time since commercial operation start). The first two plants in Kashiwazaki-Kariwa (block 6 & 7) reach operating factors below 70%, meaning that about 30% of an average year they aren't producing electricity.[3][4] In contrast other modern nuclear power plants like the Korean OPR-1000 or the German Konvoi show operating factors of about 90%.[5]

The output power of the two new ABWRs at the Hamaoka and Shika power plant had to be lowered because of technical problems in the turbines.[6] After throttling both power plants still have a heightened downtime and show other their lifetime operating factors under 50%.[7][8]

The following are new Hitachi reactor projects, only one of which appears still to be going ahead:

back